when I detect I'm missing position, so I can use the external hardware I have to move back to where I should be
Since I would only be a few pulses out of position
What i have found is that the position indicated based on "pulses" by the Mach DRO is reliable. If the PC is doing it's job
then Mach is doing it's job in reguards to the position. Pulses relate to position, but......there are other influences both
electrical, mechanical , and axis tuning which come into play. When you say you are missing a few pulses, I ask
myself...... how does he know? What is the basis of a "few"?
Let me clarify based on some testing which we did when doing threading tests.
A pulse counter ( measures to parts per million / custom made ) was hooked up to simulataneously measure pulses in five places
and could show the delta difference between the readings ( "P" in red). Three indicators of axis location ( blue color) are shown ,
but a measurement based on a standard was done. Now to relate all the data can be tricky since the axis system comes into play.
So one needs to know what he is relating the data to and the variances of the all items in the "system" .
Simply put, when you get into finding or measuring small number of pulses/ movement it can get very demanding and most will not even
have the know how or equipment to do it ( including myself ) correctly.
A little off the thread .......See attached pic
RICH